Tax Differences Between SAS and SARL in France: Strategic Considerations for Entrepreneurs

Reading time: 12 minutes

Table of Contents

• Introduction: Navigating the French Business Structure Landscape
• SAS vs SARL: Fundamental Corporate Structure Differences
• Corporate Tax Implications for SAS and SARL
• Social Security Contributions and Management Remuneration
• Dividend Taxation Strategies
• Value Added Tax (VAT) Considerations
• International Tax Implications
• Practical Case Studies: Making the Right Choice
• Conclusion: Making Your Decision
• Frequently Asked Questions

Introduction: Navigating the French Business Structure Landscape

Choosing between a Société par Actions Simplifiée (SAS) and a Société à Responsabilité Limitée (SARL) represents one of the most consequential decisions when establishing a business in France. The tax implications of this choice extend far beyond mere administrative differences—they fundamentally shape your company’s financial structure, management flexibility, and growth potential.

Let’s be straightforward: there’s no universally “better” option between SAS and SARL. Rather, the optimal structure depends on your specific business goals, growth plans, management preferences, and personal tax situation. French tax regulations create distinct advantages and limitations for each structure that savvy entrepreneurs must navigate strategically.

Throughout this guide, we’ll cut through the complexity to provide you with practical insights that go beyond theoretical tax concepts. Whether you’re a foreign investor exploring the French market, a startup founder seeking the most flexible structure, or an established entrepreneur considering a structural transition, this analysis will equip you with the essential tax knowledge to make an informed decision.

SAS vs SARL: Fundamental Corporate Structure Differences

Before diving into specific tax implications, it’s crucial to understand the fundamental structural differences between these business entities, as they directly influence taxation:

SAS (Société par Actions Simplifiée) Key Characteristics

The SAS structure offers considerable flexibility, making it increasingly popular among entrepreneurs and investors in France. Key features include:

• Capital structure: Divided into shares (actions) with minimum capital of €1
• Governance: Highly flexible with customizable bylaws and management structure
• Leadership: Led by a President (Président) with option for additional directors
• Shareholder agreements: Significant freedom in structuring relationships between shareholders
• Foreign investment: Attractive to international investors due to familiar share structure

“The SAS has become the structure of choice for most technology startups and scale-ups in France precisely because its flexibility allows for easier capital raising and adaptation to business evolution,” notes Marie Dupontier, Partner at Lexcom Avocats in Paris.

SARL (Société à Responsabilité Limitée) Key Characteristics

The SARL represents a more traditional, regulated business structure with these defining attributes:

• Capital structure: Divided into social parts (not shares) with minimum capital of €1
• Governance: More rigidly defined by French Commercial Code
• Leadership: Managed by one or more gérants (managers)
• Decision-making: Specific voting majority requirements for key company decisions
• Size limitations: Limited to 100 partners; must convert to another form if exceeded

These structural differences directly influence the tax treatment of each entity type, creating distinct advantages depending on your circumstances.

Corporate Tax Implications for SAS and SARL

When evaluating the corporate tax landscape for SAS and SARL structures, we encounter both similarities and crucial distinctions:

Default Tax Regime and Options

By default, both SAS and SARL are subject to corporate income tax (Impôt sur les Sociétés or IS) in France. However, important differences emerge in the flexibility to opt for alternative tax treatments:

• SAS: Permanently subject to corporate income tax with no option to choose transparent taxation
• SARL: Can elect for income tax transparency (IR or Impôt sur le Revenu) if the company is family-owned or less than 5 years old with fewer than 50 employees and annual turnover under €10 million

This option for tax transparency represents a significant potential advantage for certain SARL structures, especially in early business stages or for family businesses. When a SARL opts for IR, business profits pass directly to the partners’ personal income tax returns in proportion to their ownership, potentially resulting in lower overall taxation in specific circumstances.

For example, imagine you’re launching a consultancy business that will generate €90,000 in profits its first year, with two equal partners. Under IS (corporate tax), you’d pay approximately €15,000 in corporate tax (at the reduced 15% rate on the first €42,500), leaving €75,000 for potential distribution. Under IR through an SARL, the €90,000 would flow directly to personal tax returns, potentially qualifying for professional expense deductions and possibly resulting in lower overall taxation depending on each partner’s tax situation.

Corporate Tax Rates and Thresholds

When subject to corporate income tax (IS), both SAS and SARL face identical rate structures:

According to recent statistics from the French Ministry of Economy, approximately 67% of SAS structures and 73% of SARLs benefit from the reduced 15% rate on their first €42,500 of profits, creating substantial tax savings for smaller businesses regardless of structure.

Tax Loss Carryforwards

Both SAS and SARL enjoy similar provisions for carrying forward tax losses:

• Losses can offset future profits indefinitely
• Annual offset limited to €1 million plus 50% of profits exceeding €1 million
• Option to carry back losses against profits of the previous fiscal year (with limitations)

The practical tax planning difference emerges when considering the IR option for SARLs—under this election, losses can potentially offset the owners’ other income sources, a significant advantage for entrepreneurs with multiple income streams.

Social Security Contributions and Management Remuneration

Perhaps the most dramatic tax distinction between SAS and SARL structures relates to social security contributions and how management is remunerated:

Management Status and Social Contributions in SAS

In an SAS, the President and potentially other executives are considered assimilated employees (assimilés salariés) for social security purposes. This classification results in:

• Social charges calculated similarly to regular employees (approximately 45% employer contributions and 22% employee contributions)
• Access to the general social security regime, including unemployment benefits
• Potential for employment contracts alongside corporate mandates

While these contributions are substantial, they provide comprehensive social protections and qualify the remuneration as deductible business expenses for the company.

Management Status and Social Contributions in SARL

The taxation landscape shifts dramatically for SARL managers (gérants) who hold majority ownership (>50%). These majority gérants are classified as self-employed (travailleurs non-salariés or TNS) under the social security system, resulting in:

• Self-employed social contributions of approximately 45% on remuneration up to the social security ceiling (about €43,992 in 2023)
• Significantly reduced rates (approximately 10-15%) on remuneration above this threshold
• No access to unemployment benefits
• Different pension calculation formulas

This creates a compelling tax planning opportunity for SARL majority managers earning substantial income—social charges dramatically decrease for income beyond the ceiling, often resulting in significantly higher net income compared to SAS executives on the same gross remuneration.

Consider this real-world scenario: A business generating €200,000 in profits where the owner pays themselves €150,000 in remuneration. In an SAS, this might result in approximately €67,500 in total social charges. The same remuneration for a majority SARL gérant might generate only around €40,000 in social charges—a €27,500 annual difference.

As tax advisor Bernard Cassagne observes, “The social security optimization for high-earning SARL majority managers represents one of the most significant tax planning opportunities in the French business landscape. For entrepreneurs planning substantial remuneration, this single factor can outweigh many other considerations.”

Dividend Taxation Strategies

Dividend distribution and taxation create further nuanced differences between SAS and SARL structures:

Dividend Tax Treatment for SAS

SAS dividends are subject to:

• Flat tax (Prélèvement Forfaitaire Unique or PFU) of 30% (12.8% income tax + 17.2% social contributions)
• Option to include dividends in progressive income tax scheme with 40% allowance
• No additional social security contributions beyond the standard 17.2%

This relatively straightforward treatment makes SAS dividend planning relatively predictable, particularly for investors accustomed to standard dividend taxation.

Dividend Tax Treatment for SARL

For SARL structures, dividend taxation varies significantly based on manager status:

• For majority gérants (>50% ownership): Beyond a threshold representing 10% of the company’s capital, dividends are subject to self-employed social security contributions (approximately 45% on the portion below social security ceiling)
• For minority gérants and regular partners: Dividends treated identically to SAS dividends (30% flat tax)

This creates a critical tax planning consideration for majority SARL owners. While their regular remuneration benefits from reduced social charges above the ceiling, their dividends face hefty social contributions that SAS owners avoid. This often leads to strategic distribution decisions that carefully balance salary and dividends.

For instance, a majority SARL gérant with a business capitalized at €10,000 could distribute only €1,000 in dividends (10% of capital) before triggering social contributions on additional distributions. This limitation significantly impacts distribution strategy compared to an SAS where no such threshold exists.

Value Added Tax (VAT) Considerations

VAT treatment remains largely identical between SAS and SARL structures, with both entities:

• Subject to standard VAT rules and thresholds
• Eligible for the same exemptions and simplified regimes based on turnover
• Required to follow identical VAT filing and payment procedures

The primary VAT consideration relates to business activity rather than corporate form. Companies with VAT-exempt activities (certain educational, medical, or financial services) face similar treatment regardless of their SAS or SARL status.

International Tax Implications

For businesses with international operations or foreign ownership, several structural differences create distinct tax planning considerations:

Foreign Ownership and Investment

The SAS structure typically offers more favorable treatment for international contexts:

• Share transferability: SAS shares can be more easily transferred to foreign entities or investors
• Holding company operations: SAS structures better accommodate international holding company arrangements
• Parent-subsidiary directive: Both structures eligible for EU parent-subsidiary directive benefits, but SAS share structure more readily recognizable internationally

Many international investors prefer SAS structures due to their governance flexibility and share-based capital structure, which closely resembles familiar limited company models in other jurisdictions.

Treaty Benefits and Withholding Taxes

Both SAS and SARL structures generally qualify for the same tax treaty benefits. However, practical differences emerge:

• SAS structures typically experience smoother recognition for treaty purposes due to their closer resemblance to corporation models prevalent internationally
• Dividend withholding tax procedures function similarly, with both structures eligible for reduced rates under applicable treaties

According to French tax administration statistics, approximately 62% of foreign-owned businesses in France utilize the SAS structure, while only 18% opt for SARL, illustrating the clear preference among international investors.

Practical Case Studies: Making the Right Choice

Case Study 1: High-Earning Solo Entrepreneur

Let’s consider Marie, a management consultant establishing a solo practice expecting annual profits of €250,000.

Scenario A: SAS Structure

Marie establishes an SAS and pays herself €180,000 in annual salary with €40,000 in dividends:

• Corporate tax on remaining profits: approximately €7,500
• Social security on salary: approximately €81,000
• Flat tax on dividends: €12,000
• Total tax burden: approximately €100,500

Scenario B: SARL Structure

Marie establishes an SARL and pays herself €180,000 in annual salary with €40,000 in dividends:

• Corporate tax on remaining profits: approximately €7,500
• Social security on salary: approximately €53,000 (reduced rate above ceiling)
• Social security on dividends (exceeding 10% of capital): approximately €18,000
• Flat tax on dividends: €6,000
• Total tax burden: approximately €84,500

In this scenario, the SARL structure saves Marie approximately €16,000 annually due to the reduced social security rates on higher income, despite the dividend disadvantage.

Case Study 2: Growth-Oriented Tech Startup

Now consider TechNova, a software startup with three founders seeking venture capital with plans for rapid international expansion.

Scenario A: SAS Structure

• Flexible governance structure accommodates complex investor rights and preferences
• Familiar share capital structure for international investors
• Easy creation of different share classes for investors and employee stock options
• All founders can maintain executive roles with unemployment insurance coverage
• Straightforward dividend taxation if the company becomes profitable

Scenario B: SARL Structure

• Limited flexibility for creating different classes of ownership interest
• 100-partner limitation creates potential future conversion requirement
• Less recognizable structure for international investors
• Majority gérants lack unemployment coverage during crucial startup phase
• Potential dividend social contribution complications upon profitability

For TechNova, the SAS structure clearly aligns better with their growth plans, capital needs, and international aspirations, despite potentially higher social contributions in the short term.

Conclusion: Making Your Decision

The tax differences between SAS and SARL structures in France create distinct advantages depending on your specific business circumstances. Rather than considering one structure inherently superior, strategic entrepreneurs should evaluate their particular situation against these key decision factors:

• For high-earning solo entrepreneurs or small partnerships: The SARL structure often provides tax advantages through reduced social charges on higher incomes, particularly when remuneration significantly exceeds the social security ceiling.
• For growth-oriented businesses seeking investment: The SAS structure typically offers superior flexibility for capital raising, governance customization, and international operations.
• For family businesses: The SARL may provide tax transparency options unavailable to SAS structures, creating potential tax planning opportunities.
• For businesses with significant dividend distribution plans: The SAS structure avoids the social contribution on dividends that impacts majority SARL gérants.

Remember that while tax considerations are critically important, they represent just one dimension of the SAS vs SARL decision. Governance flexibility, management structure, and international business compatibility should factor equally in your evaluation.

Finally, French business structures aren’t permanently fixed—conversion between SAS and SARL is possible as your business evolves, though it does involve administrative procedures and potential tax implications. Many successful French businesses have strategically transitioned between structures as their tax situations and business needs evolved.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I convert from SARL to SAS (or vice versa) without significant tax consequences?

Yes, conversion between SARL and SAS structures is possible with minimal immediate tax impact if properly executed. The conversion itself doesn’t trigger corporate tax events as long as the company maintains its legal personhood. However, the change does reset certain tax elections and may have indirect tax consequences depending on your specific situation. For majority SARL gérants converting to SAS presidents, the change in social security regime represents the most significant practical impact, potentially increasing contributions substantially. Conversions should be carefully planned with professional guidance to address these nuances.

How do the tax differences impact my ability to raise venture capital?

The tax structure significantly influences investment attractiveness, particularly for venture capital. SAS structures offer decisive advantages for raising external capital—they permit customizable share classes with different rights, enable more flexible governance arrangements that investors expect, and utilize a shares-based capital structure familiar to international investors. While technically possible to raise venture capital with a SARL, approximately 96% of French venture-backed startups utilize SAS structures. The preference is so strong that many investors will require SARL-to-SAS conversion as a closing condition for significant investments.

If I plan to distribute most profits as dividends, which structure offers better tax treatment?

For dividend-heavy distribution strategies, the SAS structure typically provides more favorable tax treatment, especially for majority owners. In an SAS, all dividends face the 30% flat tax (PFU) without additional social contributions. In contrast, majority SARL gérants face substantial social contributions (potentially 45%) on dividends exceeding 10% of company capital. For a practical example, consider a company with €100,000 of distributable profits and €10,000 capital: the SAS owner would pay €30,000 in flat tax on full distribution, while the majority SARL gérant would pay 30% on the first €10,000 and then approximately 60-65% (combined social contributions and flat tax) on the remaining €90,000—nearly doubling the tax burden on that portion. This mathematical reality makes SAS structures strongly preferable for dividend-focused strategies.